Michal Štěpánek
2017-02-24 21:27:01 UTC
Hi,
I am reading Philosophical roots of political decision making by Rudolf
KuÄera. He has no specific metrics for governance, but as it seems to me he
is looking for blunders.
Let us say that a good governance is good for their citizens (good results).
The blunders of otherwise good governance seem to be:
transforming itself
nonsensical war
inability do defend itself
and same more I do not recall now
So as it seems to me, step 1 is to have a good governance, but step 2 is to
give constitution, foreign affairs, etc. into historically most reliable
hands.
What do you think?
Cheers
m.
I am reading Philosophical roots of political decision making by Rudolf
KuÄera. He has no specific metrics for governance, but as it seems to me he
is looking for blunders.
Let us say that a good governance is good for their citizens (good results).
The blunders of otherwise good governance seem to be:
transforming itself
nonsensical war
inability do defend itself
and same more I do not recall now
So as it seems to me, step 1 is to have a good governance, but step 2 is to
give constitution, foreign affairs, etc. into historically most reliable
hands.
What do you think?
Cheers
m.
--
michalstepanek.github.io
michalstepanek.github.io